← Cases

People v. White

144 A.D.3d 881 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2016-11-16 English

Judges Balkin, J.P., Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 881
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bobby White, Appellant.
[40 NYS3d 786]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), dated November 19, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A court determining a defendant’s risk level under the Sex

p. 882
Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA), is not permitted to downwardly depart from the presumptive risk level unless the defendant first identifies and proves by a preponderance of the evidence the facts in support of “a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the SORA Guidelines” (People v Lathan, 129 AD3d 686 , 686-687 [2015]; see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]). Here, the defendant failed to prove the existence of such a mitigating factor (see People v Jordan, 142 AD3d 596 , 596 [2016]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see id.).

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cases cited