Majority
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered January 30, 2014, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant is correct that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable. The record does not demonstrate that the defendant understood the distinction between the right to appeal and other trial rights forfeited incident to his plea of guilty (see People v Pacheco, 138 AD3d 1035 , 1036 [2016]; People v Gordon, 127 AD3d 1230 , 1230 [2015]; People v Cantarero,
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly imposed certain orders of protection at the time of sentencing is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310 , 316 [2004]; People v Deal, 115 AD3d 975 , 977 [2014]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to review this contention (see People v Remington, 90 AD3d 678 , 679 [2011]; People v Maxineau, 78 AD3d 732 , 732 [2010]).
Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Gordon 127 AD3d 1230 at 1230 p. 935
- People v. Cantarero 123 AD3d 841 at 841 p. 936
- People v. Bennett 115 AD3d 973 at 973 p. 936
- People v. Brown 122 AD3d 133 at 145 p. 936
- People v. Bradshaw 18 NY3d 257 at 264-267 p. 936
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 255 p. 936
- People v. Deal 115 AD3d 975 at 977 p. 936
- People v. Remington 90 AD3d 678 at 679 p. 936