Majority
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid, as the record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 , 927-928 [2012]; People v Hunter, 139 AD3d 754 [2016]; People v Barksdale, 131 AD3d 704 [2015]; People v Bostic, 125 AD3d 992 [2015]). Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of the defendant’s excessive sentence claim. However, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Ritorto 125 AD3d 896 p. 950
- People v. Maracle 19 NY3d 925 at 927-928 p. 950
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 950