Majority
Supreme Court correctly determined that defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion was procedurally barred by this Court’s prior af-firmance, on the merits, of defendant’s 2010 conviction and his adjudication as a second violent felony offender (CPL 440.20 [2]; 110 AD3d 485 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1198 [2014]). Defendant’s submission of additional evidence in support of his argument that his prior conviction was obtained in violation of People v Catu ( 4 NY3d 242 [2005]) does not constitute new grounds under CPL 440.20 (2).
Moreover, on its merits, defendant’s claim is unavailing in light of People v Smith ( 28 NY3d 191 [2016] [Catu not to be retroactively applied in predicate felony offender adjudication]).
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Coote 110 AD3d 485 p. 432
- People v. Catu 4 NY3d 242 p. 432
- People v. Smith 28 NY3d 191 p. 432