Majority
In an action to foreclose
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant Flora E. Rodriguez executed a note which was secured by a mortgage on a parcel of real property in Queens. After she defaulted on her payment obligations under the note, this action was commenced to foreclose the mortgage. Rodriguez answered the complaint without raising any affirmative defenses. Subsequently, a judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered and a foreclosure sale was held, at which the subject property was sold. Thereafter, Rodriguez moved to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to set aside the foreclosure sale. The Supreme Court denied Rodriguez’s motion, and she appeals.
Rodriguez was not entitled to vacatur of the judgment of foreclosure and sale pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3), since she failed to demonstrate that the judgment was procured by fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct by the plaintiff (see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Adolph, 140 AD3d 690 , 691 [2016]; Empire State Conglomerates v Mahbur, 105 AD3d 898 , 899 [2013]).
Rodriguez’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Leventhal, J.P., Chambers, Austin and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Hazzard Adolph 140 AD3d 690 at 691 p. 703
- Empire State Conglomerates v. Mahbur 105 AD3d 898 at 899 p. 703