Majority
Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered February 8, 2016, which reversed an
Given respondent’s extensive and lengthy history of rent defaults before and during the pendency of this proceeding, and the absence of an adequate explanation for her failure to comply with the terms of the stipulation of settlement, no good cause has been shown to justify a further stay of execution of the warrant of eviction (see Chelsea 19 Assoc. v James, 67 AD3d 601 [1st Dept 2009]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
Cases cited
- Chelsea 19 Associates v. James 67 AD3d 601 p. 410