Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal forecloses appellate review of her challenge to the hearing court’s suppression determination (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 , 342 [2015]; People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 , 833 [1999]; People v Anlyan, 142 AD3d 670 , 671 [2016]; People v Nelson, 137 AD3d 948 [2016]).
To the extent the defendant challenges the validity of her plea of guilty, her contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212 , 214 [2016]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here, because her plea allocution did not cast significant doubt upon her guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 , 666 [1988]; People v Hardman, 135 AD3d 785 , 786 [2016]). In any event, the plea allocution was adequate (see People v Goldstein, 12 NY3d 295 , 301 [2009]; People v Anlyan, 142 AD3d at 671 ).
Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Sanders 25 NY3d 337 at 342 p. 798
- People v. Kemp 94 NY2d 831 at 833 p. 798
- People v. Anlyan 142 AD3d 670 at 671 p. 798
- People v. Nelson 137 AD3d 948 p. 798
- People v. Williams 27 NY3d 212 at 214 p. 798
- People v. Lopez 71 NY2d 662 at 666 p. 798
- People v. Goldstein 12 NY3d 295 at 301 p. 798