Majority
Ordered that the appeal from the order of fact-finding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order of fact-finding was superseded by the order of disposition and is brought up for review on the appeal from the order of disposition; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as terminated the father’s parental rights and freed the child for adoption upon his default in appearing at the dispositional hearing is dismissed, without cost or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The father failed to appear at the dispositional hearing, and his attorney did not participate in his absence. Therefore, the dispositional portions of the order dated November 5, 2015, which terminated his parental rights and freed the child for adoption, were entered upon his default and are not appealable (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Amber Megan D., 54 AD3d 338 , 338 [2008]; Matter of Miguel M.-R.B., 36 AD3d 613 , 613-614 [2007]; Matter of Vanessa M., 263 AD2d 542 , 543 [1999]).
Contrary to the father’s contentions, the Family Court properly took judicial notice of the orders and proceedings under a prior neglect docket (see Matter of Anjoulic J., 18 AD3d 984 , 986 [2005]; Matter of Terrance L., 276 AD2d 699 , 700 [2000]; Matter of Claudina Paradise Damaris B., 227 AD2d 135 [1996]).
Contrary to the father’s contentions, the Family Court’s finding that he permanently neglected the child was supported by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner made diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136 , 142 [1984]; Matter of Mahaadai D.H. [Rhonda L.H.], 110 AD3d 878 , 880 [2013]; Matter of Victoria C. [Cassandra C], 106 AD3d 1084 , 1084-1085 [2013]). These efforts included facilitating visitation, referring the father to a parenting
Contrary to the father’s contention, he received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]; Matter of Amber Megan D., 54 AD3d at 339 ; Matter of Laura F., 48 AD3d 812 [2008]).
Rivera, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- In re Megan D. 54 AD3d 338 at 338 p. 956
- Marianne R. v. Otsego County Department of Social Services 18 AD3d 984 at 986 p. 956
- In re Terrance L. 276 AD2d 699 at 700 p. 956
- In re the Guardianship of Star Leslie W. 63 NY2d 136 at 142 p. 956
- In re Mahaadai D.H. 110 AD3d 878 at 880 p. 956
- In re Victoria C. 106 AD3d 1084 at 1084-1085 p. 956
- In re Jamie M. 63 NY2d 388 at 393 p. 957
- In re Tatiana E. 121 AD3d 682 at 683 p. 957
- People v. Baldi 54 NY2d 137 p. 957