Majority
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered June 12, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant for a directed verdict.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s proof pursuant to CPLR 4401 and dismissing plaintiff’s sole cause of action alleging a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm. A plaintiff seeking to prevail on a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing must prove that he or she sustained actual damages as a natural and probable consequence of the breach (see RXR WWP Owner LLC v WWP Sponsor, LLC, 132 AD3d 467 , 468 [2015]; see generally Kenford Co. v County of Erie, 73 NY2d 312 , 319 [1989]; Village of Kiryas Joel v County of Orange, 144 AD3d 895 , 896 [2016]). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, he failed at trial to present nonspecula-tive evidence of his alleged damages (see Friedman v Miale, 69 AD3d 789 , 791 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 706 [2011]; see generally Lloyd v Town of Wheatfield, 67 NY2d 809 , 810 [1986]). We thus conclude that the court properly granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict because, upon the evidence presented, there was no rational process by which the trier of fact could find in plaintiff’s favor (cf. Family Operating Corp. v
Present— Whalen, P.J., Lindley, NeMoyer and Troutman, JJ.
Cases cited
- RXR WWP Owner LLC v. WWP Sponsor, LLC 132 AD3d 467 at 468 p. 1814
- Kenford Co. v. County of Erie 73 NY2d 312 at 319 p. 1814
- Village of Kiryas Joel v. County of Orange 144 AD3d 895 at 896 p. 1814
- Friedman v. Miale 69 AD3d 789 at 791 p. 1814
- Lloyd v. Town of Wheatfield 67 NY2d 809 at 810 p. 1814
- Family Operating Corp. v. Young Cab Corp. 129 AD3d 1016 at 1017-1018 p. 1815
- Szczerbiak v. Pilat 90 NY2d 553 at 556 p. 1815