Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Eugene Oliver, J.), rendered September 30, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 , 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that defendant furnished a weapon to the codefendant, who fired it at the victims.
The court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the People to introduce a diagram for the purpose of aiding the jury in understanding the complex relationship among various persons involved in the incident (see People v Del Vermo, 192 NY 470 , 482 [1908]; People v Shields, 100 AD3d 549 , 550-551 [1st Dept 2012]), and in admitting evidence of a prior altercation that provided relevant background to the charged crime (see People v Dorm, 12 NY3d 16 , 19 [2009]).
The court did not err in giving the jury a lunch recess during the prosecutor’s summation, which had followed summations by the attorneys for defendant and the codefendant. Such scheduling matters are addressed to the court’s sound discretion (see People v Spears, 64 NY2d 698 , 699-700 [1984]), and defendant has not shown any resulting prejudice.
Concur— Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 348-349 p. 620
- People v. Shields 100 AD3d 549 at 550-551 p. 620
- People v. Dorm 12 NY3d 16 at 19 p. 620
- People v. Spears 64 NY2d 698 at 699-700 p. 620