Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered November 19, 2015, which, inter alia, granted the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon respon
Petitioner failed to establish any of the relevant statutory factors that would warrant leave to serve a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Kelley v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 76 AD3d 824 [1st Dept 2010]). Petitioner’s service of a notice of claim on the City of New York does not excuse her failure to serve the Housing Authority within the statutory period (see Arias v New York City Hous. Auth., 40 AD3d 298 [1st Dept 2007]). The actual knowledge of the facts constituting the claim, acquired by the City of New York, through the notice of claim and General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing, cannot be imputed onto the Housing Authority (see Seif v City of New York, 218 AD2d 595 , 596 [1st Dept 1995]). Furthermore, there has been no showing that a defense on the merits would not be prejudiced by the over 10-month delay in service (see Matter of Casale v City of New York, 95 AD3d 744 , 745 [1st Dept 2012]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Mazzarelli, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Cases cited
- Arias v. New York City Housing Authority 40 AD3d 298 p. 510
- Casale v. City of New York 95 AD3d 744 at 745 p. 510