Hyperlawhypertext legal database Maritza P. v. Devereux Foundation 149 A.D.3d 554

← Cases

Maritza P. v. Devereux Foundation

149 A.D.3d 554 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2017-04-18 English

Judges Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 554
Maritza P., as Mother and Guardian Ad Litem of Ismael Daniel M., an Infant, et al., Respondents, v Devereux Foundation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[50 NYS3d 268]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ (defendants) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants having satisfied their initial burden on summary judgment, the burden shifted to plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 324 [1986]). In satisfaction of their burden, plaintiffs offered competent proof in the form of deposition testimony, medical records and police records, which raised triable issues (see generally N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 97 NY2d 247 [2002]; Kelly G. v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 99 AD3d 756 [2d Dept 2012]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Cases cited