Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J), dated July 19, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion to vacate an order of the same court dated October 9, 2003, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment upon the defendants’ failure to appear or answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To vacate their default, the defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 AD3d 393 [2004]; Spells v A&P Supermarkets, 253 AD2d 422 [1998]; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568 , 568-569 [1997]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default lies within
Cases cited
- Santiago v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. 10 AD3d 393 p. 547
- Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis 238 AD2d 568 at 568-569 p. 547
- Carnazza v. Shoprite of Staten Island 12 AD3d 393 p. 548
- State v. Kama 267 AD2d 224 p. 548
- Bazzini v. Hertz Corp. 183 AD2d 691 p. 548