Majority
Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals ( 29 NY3d 958
The jury’s award of $450,000 for past and future pain and suffering did not differ materially from what is reasonable compensation, and plaintiff raises no challenge on appeal to the award for medical expenses. The cases relied on by plaintiff in support of his challenge to the pain and suffering award (see e.g. Firmes v Chase Manhattan Auto. Fin. Corp., 50 AD3d 18 [2d Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 705 [2008]) are distinguishable, because in those cases plaintiff had significantly more surgery than occurred here. We see no reason to increase the jury’s damages award or to order a new trial on damages.
Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
Cases cited
- Obey v. City of New York 29 NY3d 958 p. 454
- Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp. 50 AD3d 18 p. 455