Majority
Based on the factors set forth in CPL 510.30 (2) (a), we find that the habeas court correctly determined that (except to the extent that the habeas court granted relief) the bail court (Marc Whiten, J.) did not abuse its discretion in increasing bail to the amount indicated, in light of the serious charges in the underlying case including allegations of egregious domestic violence and sexual assault, petitioner’s subsequent arrest for possession of four handguns, and the potential for a lengthy sentence if convicted in either case (see People ex rel. Lazer v Warden, N.Y. County Men’s House of Detention, 79 NY2d 839 [1992]).
Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.