Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Velasquez, J.), entered May 8, 2015, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs allegedly were injured when a vehicle they occupied was involved in an accident with another vehicle. The other vehicle was being followed by a police vehicle operated by a police captain in his capacity as an officer with the New York City Police Department (hereinafter the NYPD). The plaintiffs commenced this action against the City of New York and the NYPD. After a jury trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.
“A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the
Moreover, the trial court providently exercised its discretion by not admitting the NYPD Patrol Guide into evidence, as the patrol guide imposed a higher standard of conduct on the defendants than that imposed by law (see Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth., 77 NY2d 322 , 329 [1991]; Crosland v New York City Tr. Auth., 68 NY2d 165 , 168 [1986]).
Rivera, J.P., Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Coma v. City of New York 97 AD3d 715 at 715 p. 504
- Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc. 86 NY2d 744 at 746 p. 504
- Nicastro v. Park 113 AD2d 129 at 136 p. 504
- Frezzell v. City of New York 24 NY3d 213 at 217-219 p. 504
- Rivera v. New York City Transit Authority 77 NY2d 322 at 329 p. 504
- Crosland v. New York City Transit Authority 68 NY2d 165 at 168 p. 504