Majority
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.50 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]). County Court’s “statement at sentencing that defendant had 30 days to appeal does not vitiate defendant’s otherwise valid waiver of the right to appeal” (People v West, 239 AD2d 921 , 921 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 944 [1997]). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 , 737 [1998]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 , 928 [2012]).
Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, NeMoyer, Troutman and Winslow, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 1663
- Bell v. Board of Education 90 NY2d 944 p. 1663
- People v. Hidalgo 91 NY2d 733 at 737 p. 1663
- People v. Maracle 19 NY3d 925 at 928 p. 1663