Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.),
Plaintiff established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that her vehicle was stopped at a red light when it was rear-ended by defendants’ vehicle (see Bajrami v Twinkle Cab Corp., 147 AD3d 649 [1st Dept 2017]). In opposition, defendants failed to provide a non-negligent explanation for the accident. Defendants’ opposition consisted of an affirmation of their attorney, who had no personal knowledge of the accident (see Brown v Nocella, 149 AD3d 470 [1st Dept 2017]). Moreover, the contention by defendants’ counsel that plaintiff’s vehicle stopped suddenly in the intersection was insufficient to rebut the presumption of negligence on the part of defendants’ vehicle (see Alvarez v Bryant, 143 AD3d 527 [1st Dept 2016]).
Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
Cases cited
- Brown v. Nocella 149 AD3d 470 p. 433
- Alvarez v. Bryant 143 AD3d 527 p. 433