Hyperlawhypertext legal database Blake v. Annucci 156 A.D.3d 1102

← Cases

Blake v. Annucci

156 A.D.3d 1102 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2017-12-14 English

Judges McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 1102
In the Matter of William Blake, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
[65 NYS3d 477]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by or

p. 1103
der of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, we dismiss the petition as moot (see Matter of Arriaga v Capra, 153 AD3d 1542 , 1542 [2017]; Matter of Tolliver v Fischer, 140 AD3d 1507 , 1508 [2016]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cases cited