Majority
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.50 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that County Court did not conflate the waiver of the right to appeal with those rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v Mills, 151 AD3d 1744 , 1745 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1131 [2017]). The court “ ‘expressly ascertained from defendant that, as a condition of the plea, [she] was agreeing to waive [her] right to appeal’ ” (People v McCrea, 140 AD3d 1655 , 1655 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 933 [2016]). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 , 737 [1998]; cf People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 , 928 [2012]).
Present—Whalen, P.J., Centra, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Winslow, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Hidalgo 91 NY2d 733 at 737 p. 1416
- People v. Maracle 19 NY3d 925 at 928 p. 1416