Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered November 7, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this legal malpractice action for failure to state a cause of action and as untimely, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff Billiard Balls Management (Billiard) sufficiently stated a claim for legal malpractice. The record clearly establishes an attorney-client relationship, as defendant entered into two stipulations extending Billiard’s time to answer in an underlying personal injury action, which were filed in court, and represented itself as Billiard’s attorney (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453 , 455 [1st Dept 1987]; compare Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94 , 99 [1st Dept 2008]).
The motion court also properly determined that the action was timely commenced (CPLR 214 [6]). Assuming that the mal
Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
Cases cited
- Cooke v. Laidlaw Adams & Peck, Inc. 126 AD2d 453 at 455 p. 419
- Pellegrino v. Oppenheimer & Co. 49 AD3d 94 at 99 p. 419
- Gershman v. Ahmad 131 AD3d 1104 p. 420
- Coyle v. Lefkowitz 89 AD3d 1054 at 1056 p. 420
- Brown v. State 250 AD2d 314 at 319 p. 420