Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J.
The record supports the court’s finding that a photo array was not unduly suggestive. Defendant and the other participants were reasonably similar in appearance (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 , 335 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]), and the differences between defendant’s photo and the other photos were not sufficient to create a substantial likelihood that defendant would be singled out for identification (id. at 336; see also People v Foster, 272 AD2d 410 , 410-411 [2d Dept 2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 889 [2000]).
Concur—Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Gische, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Chipp 75 NY2d 327 at 335 p. 555