Majority
In an action pursuant, inter alia, to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement over a portion of the property of the defendants Joseph Decker, Regina
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Since issues of fact exist as to the intention of the original grantor at the time of the original conveyance, the plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to an implied easement as a matter of law (see O’Connor v Demarest, 280 AD2d 878 [2001]; Palma v Mastroianni, 276 AD2d 894 [2000]; Manhattan Beach Community Group v Laboz, 224 AD2d 394 [1996]; cf. Weil v Atlantic Beach Holding Corp., 1 NY2d 20 , 28-29 [1956]; Fischer v Liebman, 137 AD2d 485 , 487 [1988]).
Absolute necessity in fact is the standard for a finding of an easement by necessity (see Town of Pound Ridge v Golenbock, 264 AD2d 773 [1999]; Van Schaack v Torsoe, 161 AD2d 701 , 703 [1990]). Here, an issue of fact exists as to whether there is an alternative means of access to the plaintiffs property (see Nieto v Ceraso, 134 AD2d 579 , 580 [1987]). Florio, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 p. 470
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 p. 470
- O'Connor v. Demarest 280 AD2d 878 p. 470
- Palma v. Mastroianni 276 AD2d 894 p. 470
- Manhattan Beach Community Group, Inc. v. Laboz 224 AD2d 394 p. 470
- Weil v. Atlantic Beach Holding Corp. 1 NY2d 20 at 28-29 p. 470
- Fischer v. Liebman 137 AD2d 485 at 487 p. 470
- Town of Pound Ridge v. Golenbock 264 AD2d 773 p. 470
- Van Schaack v. Torsos 161 AD2d 701 at 703 p. 470
- Nieto v. Ceraso 134 AD2d 579 at 580 p. 470