Majority
— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered February 20, 2004, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and awarded him a judgment of divorce.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6). Thus, the burden shifted to the defendant, in opposing sum
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 at 562 p. 854
- Christian v. Christian 42 NY2d 63 p. 854
- Kammerer v. Kammerer 278 AD2d 282 p. 854
- Warren v. Rabinowitz 228 AD2d 492 p. 854
- Stern v. Stern 114 AD2d 408 at 409 p. 854
- Berman v. Berman 72 AD2d 425 at 429 p. 854
- Berman v. Berman 52 NY2d 723 p. 854