Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 24, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a nursing assistant at a hospital and her duties included changing the clothing and bedding of incontinent patients. During one of claimant’s shifts, she was instructed by her supervisor to change four patients who had called for assistance. Claimant changed one, but went on her break without changing the others. She was terminated as a result. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she was terminated due to misconduct and adhered to this decision upon reconsideration. Claimant now appeals.
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Swinton 22 AD3d 947 at 948 p. 1156
- In re the Claim of Goodrich 301 AD2d 720 at 720 p. 1156
- In re the Claim of Spencer 22 AD3d 1010 at 1010 p. 1156