Majority
Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961 [1989]; People v Sullivan, 153 AD2d 223 , 232-233 [1990]). In any event, the defendant’s adjudication as a second felony offender was proper (compare People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52 [2000]; People v Stanley, 12 AD3d 467 [2004]).
Appellate review of the defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed was excessive was effectively waived by him as part of his plea agreement (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; see also People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Smith 73 NY2d 961 p. 514
- People v. Sullivan 153 AD2d 223 at 232-233 p. 514
- People v. Samms 95 NY2d 52 p. 514
- People v. Stanley 12 AD3d 467 p. 514
- People v. Callahan 80 NY2d 273 p. 514
- People v. Muniz 91 NY2d 570 p. 514
- People v. Seaberg 74 NY2d 1 p. 514