Majority
In a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated January 25, 2005, which modified an order of the District Rent Administrator dated November 24, 2004, by
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the landlord’s contention, the determination of the respondent, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, to award the tenants treble damages for rent overcharges was not arbitrary and capricious, and had a rational basis (see Matter of Ador Realty, LLC v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 25 AD3d 128 , 140 [2005]; Matter of Chu v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 231 AD2d 567 , 568 [1996]; Matter of Charles Birdoff & Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 204 AD2d 630 , 630-631 [1994]). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Carni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Ador Realty, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal 25 AD3d 128 at 140 p. 556
- Chu v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal 231 AD2d 567 at 568 p. 556
- Charles Birdoff & Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal 204 AD2d 630 at 630-631 p. 556