Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered March 10, 2006, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While attempting to disembark a bus owned and operated by
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment (see Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065 , 1067 [1979]). The evidence submitted by the defendants, including the plaintiffs deposition testimony and that of the bus driver, established that the defendants did not breach a duty owed to the plaintiff since, under the weather conditions which existed at the time of the accident, “[i]t would be unreasonable to expect the defendants] to constantly clean the floor[s] of [their] buses” (Spooner v New York City Tr. Auth., 298 AD2d 575 , 575-576 [2002]; see Hussein v New York City Tr. Auth., 266 AD2d 146 , 146-147 [1999]). The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 , 562 [1980]; Indig v Finkelstein, 23 NY2d 728 , 729 [1968]). Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc. 46 NY2d 1065 at 1067 p. 856
- Spooner v. New York City Transit Authority 298 AD2d 575 at 575-576 p. 856
- Hussein v. New York City Transit Authority 266 AD2d 146 at 146-147 p. 856
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 at 562 p. 856
- Indig v. Finkelstein 23 NY2d 728 at 729 p. 856