Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered January 26, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, on renewal of a prior order, granted the petition to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion to renew and the petition denied.
The motion court lacked discretion to grant petitioner leave to file a late notice of claim, since his reargument/renewal motion was made 12 days after the one-year-and-90-day limitations period had expired (Matter of Goffredo v City of New York, 33 AD3d 346 , 347 [2006]). Nor is such an untimely motion permitted to relate back to the date when the originally timely motion
Cases cited
- Goffredo v. City of New York 33 AD3d 346 at 347 p. 125
- Asaro v. City of New York 167 AD2d 130 p. 126
- Williams v. City of New York 290 AD2d 354 p. 126