Majority
Further, the plaintiffs self-serving affidavit was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury as a result of the subject accident (see Rashid v Estevez, 47 AD3d 786 [2008]; Roman v Fast Lane Car Serv., Inc., 46 AD3d 535 [2007]; Verette v Zia, 44 AD3d 747 [2007]; Duke v Saurelis, 41 AD3d 770 [2007]). Moreover, neither the plaintiff nor his treating physician adequately explained the discontinuance of the plaintiffs treatment in October 2002 (see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566 [2005]; Wei-San Hsu v Briscoe Protective Sys., Inc., 43 AD3d 916 [2007]; Bestman v Seymour, 41 AD3d 629 [2007]; Albano v Onolfo, 36 AD3d 728 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. 98 NY2d 345 p. 801
- Malave v. Basikov 45 AD3d 539 p. 801
- Furrs v. Griffith 43 AD3d 389 p. 801
- Friedman v. U-Haul Truck Rental 216 AD2d 266 at 267 p. 801
- Rashid v. Estevez 47 AD3d 786 p. 801
- Roman v. Fast Lane Car Service, Inc. 46 AD3d 535 p. 801
- Duke v. Saurelis 41 AD3d 770 p. 801
- Pommells v. Perez 4 NY3d 566 p. 801
- Wei-San Hsu v. Briscoe Protective Systems, Inc. 43 AD3d 916 p. 801
- Bestman v. Seymour 41 AD3d 629 p. 801
- Albano v. Onolfo 36 AD3d 728 p. 801