Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered November 1, 2006, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, reckless driving, driving while ability impaired by alcohol, and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The introduction of testimony regarding the results of a portable breathalyzer test performed on the defendant did not constitute reversible error, because this testimony was elicited after defense counsel opened the door to the matter on cross-examination (s ee People v Melendez, 55 NY2d 445 , 451-453 [1982]; People v Joyner, 295 AD2d 625 [2002]; People v Peoples, 143 AD2d 780 [1988]). Moreover, any potential prejudice to the defendant was alleviated by the trial court’s curative instructions to the jury (see People v Hernandez, 11 AD3d 479 [2004]; People v Joyner, 295 AD2d at 625 ).
The defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 , 712 [1998]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 , 412 [1980], cert denied 449 US 1087 [1981]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 , 83 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Santucci, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 828
- People v. Romero 7 NY3d 633 p. 828
- People v. Melendez 55 NY2d 445 at 451-453 p. 828
- People v. Peoples 143 AD2d 780 p. 828
- People v. Hernandez 11 AD3d 479 p. 828
- People v. Benevento 91 NY2d 708 at 712 p. 828
- People v. Pena 50 NY2d 400 at 412 p. 828
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 at 83 p. 828