Majority
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the issue of liability upon the defendant’s failure to answer and to set the matter down for an inquest on the issue of damages. To successfully oppose the plaintiffs’ motion, the defendant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Giovanelli v Rivera, 23 AD3d 616 [2005]; Mjahdi v Maguire, 21 AD3d 1067 , 1068 [2005]; Thompson v Steuben Realty Corp., 18 AD3d 864 , 865 [2005]; Dinstber v Fludd, 2 AD3d 670 , 671 [2003]). Although a court has the discretion to accept law office failure as a reasonable excuse (see CPLR 2005), the defendant’s conclusory, undetailed, and uncorroborated claim of law office failure did not amount to a reasonable excuse (see Matter of ELRAC, Inc. v Holder, 31 AD3d 636 , 637 [2006]; McClaren v Bell Atl., 30 AD3d 569 [2006]; Matter of Denton v City of Mount Vernon, 30 AD3d 600 , 601 [2006]; Solomon v
Cases cited
- Giovanelli v. Rivera 23 AD3d 616 p. 949
- Mjahdi v. Maguire 21 AD3d 1067 at 1068 p. 949
- Thompson v. Steuben Realty Corp. 18 AD3d 864 at 865 p. 949
- Dinstber v. Fludd 2 AD3d 670 at 671 p. 949
- ELRAC, Inc. v. Nashon Holder 31 AD3d 636 at 637 p. 949
- McClaren v. Bell Atlantic 30 AD3d 569 p. 949
- Denton v. City of Mount Vernon 30 AD3d 600 at 601 p. 949
- Majestic Clothing Inc. v. East Coast Storage, LLC 18 AD3d 516 at 518 p. 950