Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover a brokerage commission, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), dated January 7, 2008, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“To recover a commission, a real estate broker must estab
The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment through its submission of deposition testimony and affidavits demonstrating that a meeting of the minds was not reached regarding essential terms of a contract to sell real property (see Hampton Country Real Estate v Rizzo, 305 AD2d 458 [2003]; Jacob v O’Brien, 252 AD2d 515 [1998]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Hampton Country Real Estate v Rizzo, 305 AD2d 458 [2003]).
In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Kaelin v. Warner 27 NY2d 352 at 355 p. 803
- Marjorie Hausman Realty Co. v. Klaver 262 AD2d 613 p. 803
- Harold F. Shepherd Real Estate, Inc. v. Ferguson 204 AD2d 392 p. 803
- Jacob v. O'Brien 252 AD2d 515 p. 803