Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In response to the defendant’s showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether it committed medical malpractice in discharging Kevon Stewart, the decedent’s son, from its psychiatric facility on May 6, 2004, the plaintiff established the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289 , 295-296 [1985]; Seibert v Fink, 280 AD2d 661 [2001]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616 , 616-617 [1984]; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 324 [1986]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289 , 294-295 [1985]; Engelhart v County of Orange, 16 AD3d 369 , 371 [2005]; Clark v State of New York, 99 AD2d 616 [1984]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Schrempf v. State 66 NY2d 289 at 295-296, at 294-295 p. 861
- Seibert v. Fink 280 AD2d 661 p. 861
- Clark v. State 99 AD2d 616 at 616-617 p. 861
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 at 324 p. 861
- Engelhart v. County of Orange 16 AD3d 369 at 371 p. 861