Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 7, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a caterer in a delicatessen for approximately eight months. She was discharged by her employer after allegedly directing profanity at him in the presence of other employees. Although her application for unemployment insurance benefits was initially denied, an Administrative Law Judge credited claimant’s testimony over that of her employer and awarded her benefits following a hearing. Upon review, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed and ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment due to misconduct. This appeal ensued.
Spain, J.E, Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Radu 13 AD3d 701 at 702 p. 1063
- In re the Claim of Kemp 25 AD3d 1054 at 1054 p. 1063