Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J), entered August 7, 2009 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, to declare invalid the designating petitions naming respondents Gerald D. Jennings, Betty Barnette, Leif C. Engstrom and Carolyn McLaughlin as Independence Party candidates for certain public offices in the City of Albany at the September 15, 2009 primary election.
Respondents Gerald D. Jennings, Betty Barnette, Leif C. Engstrom and Carolyn McLaughlin (hereinafter collectively referred to as respondents) are Democratic Party candidates seeking election to the respective public offices of Mayor, Treasurer, Chief Auditor and Common Council President in the City of Albany. Their names appeared on joint designating petitions
As stipulated by the parties, the signatories were not sworn, questioned about the statements contained in the petition or asked to affirm the truth of the information set forth therein. Nor did the notaries public and commissioners of deeds make any effort to obtain from the signatories either an affirmation or acknowledgment as to the truthfulness of their statements (see Election Law § 6-132 [3]; Matter of Liebler v Friedman, 54 AD3d 697 , 697-698 [2008]; Matter of Imre v Johnson, 54 AD3d 427 , 428 [2008]). Thus, Supreme Court properly invalidated the petitions.
Nor do we find that Election Law § 6-132 (3) unconstitutionally burdens intervenors’ First Amendment rights of political expression and free association.[1] The oath or affirmation requirement at issue here is applicable only where a nonparty member, who is either a notary public or a commissioner of deeds, circulates a designating petition (see Election Law § 6-132 [3]). Rather than burdening the process for candidates seeking the nomination of a political party in which they are not
* The Attorney General’s office was notified of the constitutional challenge, as required by Executive Law § 71 and CPLR 1012 (b), and has declined to intervene.
Spain, J.E, Rose, Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- Liebler v. Friedman 54 AD3d 697 at 697-698 p. 802
- Imre v. Johnson 54 AD3d 427 at 428 p. 802