Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 22, 2008, which, upon reconsideration, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
In April 2004, claimant established a limited liability company for the purpose of setting up an investment hedge fund. Claimant’s initial investment was $30,000 and total investment in the endeavor amounted to some $185,000. Subsequently, claimant accepted employment with a financial management company, but that employment ended in February 2007. In May 2007, claimant applied for and was denied unemployment insurance benefits, and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that he was ineligible to receive such benefits because his continued participation with the limited liability company rendered him not totally unemployed. Claimant now appeals.
Whether a claimant is totally unemployed and, thus, entitled to receive unemployment benefits is a factual issue for the Board to resolve and its determination will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Antoniou [Commissioner of Labor], 64 AD3d 853 , 853 [2009]; Matter of Bernard [Commissioner of Labor], 53 AD3d 1006 , 1006 [2008]). A claimant who is a principal in an ongoing corporation will not be considered totally unemployed if he or she stands to benefit financially
Cardona, P.J., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Antoniou 64 AD3d 853 at 853 p. 1287
- In re Bernard 53 AD3d 1006 at 1006 p. 1287
- In re Claim of Thomas 58 AD3d 1099 at 1099-1100 p. 1288
- In re the Claim of Spielman 42 AD3d 621 at 622 p. 1288