Majority
p. 974Stan Stuart, Doing Business as Silver River Marina, Respondent, v Linda Tennen Kushner, Appellant. [889 NYS2d 853]
p. 975
Affording the complaint a liberal construction, accepting all facts as alleged in the complaint to be true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference as required on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83 , 87-88 [1994]; Shaya B. Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34 , 38 [2006]), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the first cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 , 442 [2007]).
However, the Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to dismiss the second and third causes of action seeking to recover damages for negligence and fraud, as those causes of action are duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849 , 850 [2009]; Sitar v Sitar, 50 AD3d 667 , 670 [2008]; Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 42 AD3d 436 , 437 [2007]; Town of Wallkill v Rosenstein, 40 AD3d 972 , 974 [2007]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit or need not be considered in light of our determination. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Miller and Roman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Leon v. Martinez 84 NY2d 83 at 87-88 p. 975
- Shaya B. Pacific, LLC v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP 38 AD3d 34 at 38 p. 975
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer 8 NY3d 438 at 442 p. 975
- Turner III v. Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP 61 AD3d 849 at 850 p. 975
- Sitar v. Sitar 50 AD3d 667 at 670 p. 975
- Iannucci v. Kucker & Bruh, LLP 42 AD3d 436 at 437 p. 975
- Town of Wallkill v. Rosenstein 40 AD3d 972 at 974 p. 975