Majority
The trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to elicit testimony from the arresting officer, over defense counsel’s objection, that the defendant did not provide the officer, at any time during the arrest process, with certain facts (see People v Basora, 75 NY2d 992 , 993 [1990]; People v Lippolis, 246 AD2d 557 [1998]; People v Robinson, 191 AD2d 595 , 596 [1993]). However, we find that the error was harmless because there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 , 237 [1975]; People v Romero, 54 AD3d 781 , 781 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Covello, J.P, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Hawkins 11 NY3d 484 at 491-492 p. 763
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 763
- People v. Romero 7 NY3d 633 p. 763
- People v. Vasquez 297 AD2d 297 at 298 p. 763
- People v. Chiddick 8 NY3d 445 at 447-448 p. 763
- People v. Krotoszynski 43 AD3d 450 at 452-453 p. 763
- People v. Basora 75 NY2d 992 at 993 p. 763
- People v. Robinson 191 AD2d 595 at 596 p. 763
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 at 237 p. 763