Majority
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti
Supreme Court lacked the authority to modify the administrative penalty since it dismissed the petition as time-barred (see Matter of Van Cortlandt Park Dodge v Commissioner of Dept. of Consumer Affairs of City of N.Y., 178 AD2d 234 , 235 [1991]). The reduction of the penalty was also improper because the original penalty did not shock the conscience (see e.g. Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 , 38 [2001]), particularly where Supreme Court had concluded that it was “very reasonable.” Furthermore, although during settlement discussions respondent had offered to reduce the penalty to $100,000, this is not a basis on which to reduce the penalty. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Cases cited
- Van Cortlandt Park Dodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs 178 AD2d 234 at 235 p. 535
- Kelly v. Safir 96 NY2d 32 at 38 p. 535