Majority
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an employment agreement, and for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the defendants interfered with the plaintiffs contractual relations, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Alessandro, J.), dated January 21, 2009, which granted the motion of the defendant Raymond Melville, the separate motion of the defendants Allran Electric of New York, Inc., and Platinum Maintenance Services Corp., and the separate motion of the defendants Petrocelli Electric Co., Inc., Leonard A. Copicotto, and Nick Rozakis, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for the entry of a judgment making appropriate declarations in accordance herewith.
The defendants Allran Electric of New York, Inc. (hereinafter
In addition, in his separate motion, the defendant Raymond Melville made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, as did the defendants Petrocelli Electric Co., Inc., Leonard A. Copicotto, and Nick Rozakis, in their separate motion seeking the same relief. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those motions as well.
The plaintiffs remaining contentions either are without merit or do not require reversal.
Since this is, in part, a declaratory judgment action, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for the entry of a judgment making appropriate declarations (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317 , 329 [1962], appeal dismissed 371 US 74 , [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Austin, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 at 324-325 p. 715
- Horn v. New York Times 100 NY2d 85 at 90-91 p. 715
- De Petris v. Union Settlement Ass'n 86 NY2d 406 at 410 p. 715
- Daub v. Future Tech Enterprise, Inc. 65 AD3d 1004 at 1005 p. 715
- Trakis v. Manhattanville College 51 AD3d 778 at 780 p. 715
- Wieder v. Skala 80 NY2d 628 at 638 p. 715
- Lanza v. Wagner 11 NY2d 317 at 329 p. 715