Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 18, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the pretrial identification procedure was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, the hearing court properly denied suppression of the identification testimony of the witness who identified the defendant during that procedure (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 , 335-336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Chipp 75 NY2d 327 at 335-336 p. 1092
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 1093
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 p. 1093
- Middleton v. McNeil 542 US 946 p. 1093
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 1093
- People v. Romero 7 NY3d 633 p. 1093
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 1093