Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered November 22, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]). County Court properly refused to admit in evidence that part of a statement made by a codefendant to police investigators in which he indicated that he shot his weapon in the direction of the victim’s vehicle when he observed the vehicle almost hit his brother. Contrary to defendant’s contention, that part of the codefendant’s statement is not admissible as a declaration against penal interest because it was not “disserving to the [codefendant]” (People v Brensic, 70 NY2d 9 , 16 [1987], mot to amend remittitur granted 70 NY2d 722 [1987]; see generally People v Geoghegan, 51 NY2d 45 , 49 [1980]). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 , 621 [1983]), is legally sufficient
Cases cited
- People v. Brensic 70 NY2d 9 at 16 p. 1817
- People v. Geoghegan 51 NY2d 45 at 49 p. 1817
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 1817
- People v. Montanez 57 AD3d 1366 at 1366-1367 p. 1818
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 1818
- People v. Danielson 9 NY3d 342 at 349 p. 1818