Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered June 26, 2009 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
We affirm. Initially, we note that habeas corpus relief is not available where petitioner could have raised this argument by way of a CPL article 440 motion or on direct appeal (see People ex rel. Brown v Artus, 64 AD3d 1064 , 1064 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]; People ex rel. Woodard v Lape, 58 AD3d 903 , 904 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 706 [2009]). In any event, the “sentence and order of commitment” form contained in the record establishes that a valid judgment of conviction was entered and satisfies the statutory requirements (see CPL 380.60; People ex rel. Haynes v Artus, 51 AD3d 1075 [2008]).
Mercure, J.P, Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- People ex rel. Brown v. Artus 64 AD3d 1064 at 1064 p. 1022
- People ex rel. Woodard v. Lape 58 AD3d 903 at 904 p. 1022