Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta In re Ellner 76 A.D.2d 282

← Cases

In re Ellner

76 A.D.2d 282 Court Second Department, Decision date 2010-06-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 282
[902 NYS2d 406]
In the Matter of Ethan E. Ellner, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Second Department,
June 22, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Rita E. Adler, Hauppauge (Michael Fuchs of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

p. 283
By opinion and order of this Court dated March 15, 1999, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year as a result of his conviction of attempt to evade or defeat tax, in violation of 26 USC § 7201 (see Matter of Ellner, 253 AD2d 103 [1999]). By opinion and order of this Court dated November 28, 2001, the respondent was reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 11, 2009, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4 (1) (1) (ii) and (iii), based upon a finding that he was guilty of professional misconduct threatening the public interest. By the same decision and order, this Court authorized the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent under Appellate Division docket No. 2009-00303, based on a petition dated April 1, 2009, and referred the issues raised in the petition to a Special Referee to hear and report.

On December 1, 2009, the respondent was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, in the County Court, Suffolk County, before the Honorable James F.X. Doyle, of three counts of grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony, in violation of Penal Law § 155.40, and one count of scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 190.65. The respondent has not yet been sentenced.

By virtue of his felony conviction, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), and was automatically disbarred.

Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion to now strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) is granted, to reflect the respondent’s disbarment as of December 1, 2009.

The previously authorized disciplinary proceeding under Appellate Division docket No. 2009-00303 is discontinued.

Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Ethan E. Ellner, is disbarred, effective December 1, 2009, and his name is now stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b); and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Ethan E. Ellner, shall continue to comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of

p. 284
disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Ethan E. Ellner, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and its is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Ethan E. Ellner, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f); and it is further,

Ordered that the previously authorized disciplinary proceeding pending under Appellate Division docket No. 2009-00303 is discontinued.

Cases cited

Statutes and regulations cited