Majority
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 , 256 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 , 11 [1989]). There was no effort to conceal error, and the defendant was made fully aware of any appealable issues (see People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876 , 878 [1996]). Accordingly, the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal, made as part of his sentencing agreement after a jury verdict of guilty, was valid and precludes review of the issues raised on appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876 [1996]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Austin, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Lopez 6 NY3d 248 at 256 p. 1205
- People v. Seaberg 74 NY2d 1 at 11 p. 1205
- People v. Holman 89 NY2d 876 at 878 p. 1205