Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated June 11, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the apparatus the plaintiff was using was not defective and that the plaintiff was unable to identify the cause of her accident (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 324 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 , 853 [1985]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 , 562 [1980]; Slattery v O’Shea, 46 AD3d
Cases cited
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 at 324 p. 1114
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center 64 NY2d 851 at 853 p. 1114
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 at 562 p. 1114