Majority
Appeal from a
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law former § 155.35), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to conduct a restitution hearing. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review “inasmuch as he failed to object to the amount of restitution at sentencing or to request a hearing with respect thereto” (People v Jorge N.T., 70 AD3d 1456 , 1457 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 889 [2010]; see People v Marvin, 68 AD3d 1729 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 842 [2010]). Furthermore, defendant waived that contention because he expressly consented to the amount of restitution imposed (see People v Brown, 70 AD3d 1378 [2010]; People v Vogel, 20 AD3d 865 [2005], appeal dismissed 6 NY3d 728 [2005]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Martoche, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Jorge N.T. 70 AD3d 1456 at 1457 p. 1790
- People v. Marvin 68 AD3d 1729 p. 1790
- People v. Vogel 20 AD3d 865 p. 1790
- People v. Vogel 6 NY3d 728 p. 1790