Majority
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiffs presented evidence which established all of the elements necessary for the imposition of a constructive trust (see Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119 , 121 [1976]). Moreover, we reject the defendant’s argument that the plaintiffs are precluded from obtaining the equitable relief in the nature of a constructive trust because they had unclean hands, as the purportedly immoral conduct ascribed to them is not alleged to have been directed at the defendant (see Columbo v Columbo, 50 AD3d 617 , 619 [2008]). Finally, we agree with the plaintiffs that the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable here (see Matter of One Beacon Ins. Co. v Espinoza, 37 AD3d 607 , 608 [2007]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Sharp v. Kosmalski 40 NY2d 119 at 121 p. 675
- Columbo v. Columbo 50 AD3d 617 at 619 p. 675
- One Beacon Insurance v. Espinoza 37 AD3d 607 at 608 p. 675