Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost her employment as a customer service representative due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant violated the employer’s policy regarding the electronic communication system by forwarding a personal e-mail to half of the company employees while on the telephone with a customer. The record also evidences that claimant put the customer on hold in order to send the e-mail and then asked the customer to repeat information which already had been relayed. Inasmuch as a knowing violation of an employer’s established policy or
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Dzaba 6 AD3d 907 p. 879
- In re the Claim of Graham 305 AD2d 922 p. 879
- In re the Claim of Livadas 3 AD3d 656 p. 879